← Back to articles

eBPF-Powered Runtime Security and Observability in Kubernetes

eBPF revolutionizes Kubernetes security with kernel-level monitoring

eBPF-Powered Runtime Security and Observability in Kubernetes: The Next-Generation Approach to Zero-Trust Container Monitoring

The Kernel Revolution Is Here

Traditional container monitoring is dead. While you're wrestling with heavyweight agents and bloated sidecars, Extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) has quietly rewritten the rules of runtime security by moving observability directly into the Linux kernel.

This isn't just another monitoring tool—it's zero-instrumentation, kernel-native visibility that sees everything and costs almost nothing.

Why Agent-Based Monitoring Failed

Traditional monitoring suffers from fundamental flaws:

  • Performance overhead: Legacy agents consume 5-15% CPU
  • Visibility gaps: Only sees what applications expose
  • Attack surface: Each agent can be compromised
  • Operational complexity: Managing agents across thousands of containers

eBPF eliminates these problems by moving observability to the kernel.

eBPF: Kernel-Native Revolution

eBPF attaches lightweight programs to Linux kernel hooks, capturing network traffic, system calls, and security events with overhead typically under 1%.

2024-2025 Kernel Improvements

Recent Linux enhancements make eBPF even more powerful:

BPF Tokens (Linux 6.9): Delegate limited eBPF privileges to unprivileged processes, enabling fine-grained security in multi-tenant environments.

BPF Arena (Linux 6.9): Shared-memory region between BPF programs and userspace for high-throughput monitoring.

BPF Scheduler (Linux 6.12): Custom scheduling policies in BPF for workload-aware container scheduling.

Real-World Implementation

Runtime Threat Detection

// eBPF program detecting privilege escalation
SEC("tracepoint/syscalls/sys_enter_execve")
int trace_execve(struct trace_event_raw_sys_enter* ctx) {
    u32 pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
    u32 uid = bpf_get_current_uid_gid() & 0xffffffff;
    
    if (uid == 0 && is_suspicious_binary(ctx->filename)) {
        struct security_event event = {
            .pid = pid,
            .uid = uid,
            .timestamp = bpf_ktime_get_ns(),
            .event_type = PRIVILEGE_ESCALATION,
        };
        
        bpf_perf_event_output(ctx, &events, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, 
                             &event, sizeof(event));
    }
    
    return 0;
}

Network Policy Enforcement

SEC("cgroup/skb")
int network_policy_enforcer(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
    u32 container_id = get_container_id(skb);
    struct network_policy *policy = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&policies, &container_id);
    
    if (policy && !is_allowed_connection(skb, policy)) {
        log_blocked_connection(skb, container_id);
        return TC_ACT_SHOT; // Block traffic
    }
    
    return TC_ACT_OK;
}

The eBPF Security Ecosystem

Tetragon: Runtime Security

  • Kernel-level runtime enforcement
  • Cryptographic process lineage tracking
  • Fileless attack detection

Cilium: Network Security

  • Identity-based network policies
  • Transparent encryption
  • Deep network visibility via Hubble

Falco: Behavioral Monitoring

  • Real-time threat detection
  • Container escape detection
  • SIEM integration

Performance Comparison

MetricTraditional AgentseBPF-Based
CPU Overhead5-15%<1%
Memory Usage100-500MB/node10-50MB/node
Deployment ComplexityHighLow
Visibility DepthApplication-limitedKernel-level

Implementation Strategy

Phase 1: Observability

Deploy Tetragon for read-only monitoring:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
  name: tetragon
  namespace: kube-system
spec:
  template:
    spec:
      hostNetwork: true
      hostPID: true
      containers:
      - name: tetragon
        image: quay.io/cilium/tetragon:latest
        securityContext:
          privileged: true

Phase 2: Policy Enforcement

Implement Cilium NetworkPolicies:

apiVersion: cilium.io/v2
kind: CiliumNetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: web-app-policy
spec:
  endpointSelector:
    matchLabels:
      app: web-app
  ingress:
  - fromEndpoints:
    - matchLabels:
        app: load-balancer

The Zero-Trust Future

eBPF enables kernel-level zero-trust enforcement where every system call and network packet is visible and controllable in real-time.

Key Benefits

  • Immediate threat response: Block attacks as they happen
  • Compliance automation: Automatic policy enforcement
  • Performance optimization: Kernel-level visibility into bottlenecks
  • Cost reduction: Eliminate expensive monitoring infrastructure

Practical Takeaways

  1. Start with observability before enforcement
  2. Leverage existing tools like Cilium and Tetragon
  3. Monitor performance impact even with low overhead
  4. Design for scale in high-volume environments
  5. Invest in expertise for custom implementations

The future of container security isn't better agents—it's kernel-native eBPF making security and observability part of the operating system itself.

For deeper technical details, see the comprehensive eBPF ecosystem progress report.